My thoughts on whatever happens to wander through my mind
 
 
 
Local links
 
Other links
 
 
 
Texas blogs
 
 
 
Blogroll - Blogroll Me!
 
 
Tuesday, June 29, 2004
 
Radio interference, networks and the Internet: a good way to chew up an evening

I recently installed an antenna in my attic to use on the 2-meter Amateur Radio band (144.00 - 148.00 MHz), and once I connected and turned on the radio, I immediately noticed severe interference across most of the band. I originally suspected it was the wireless alarm sensors, but when I shut off the power to see exactly where it was coming from, I was surprised to learn it originated from my network router.

I spent yesterday evening rerouting everything through the wireless router (which has several wired ports in addition to the wireless connections) because it didn't seem to be radiating any interference. Go figure: the router designed to send everything down the wire generates horribly interfering emissions, but the one designed to transmit (admittedly, at a much higher frequency) doesn't cause any problems.

Once I got all the cables switched over, I had no Internet access. I could see every computer on the network, but I couldn't get to the Internet. With desperate Internet users breathing down my neck, it was a problem I had to solve — immediately, if not sooner. I eventually remembered that the router operates in one of two modes: merely as a router on a network, or as the gateway to the Internet. Once I set it to operate as a gateway, everything was fine. Well, almost. Changing the setting to "gateway" somehow knocked my laptop off the wireless connection. The wired connection was working, so I just tried rebooting (what else?), and everything came back up.

So now everything is copacetic. All the computers are connected to the Internet and each other, and I don't get interference on two meters. Next up: installation of a 70cm antenna in the attic. This should be much easier than the 2-meter installation, since I'll be covering recently-traveled ground.



Friday, June 25, 2004
 
The Alliance of Digital Brownshirts

In his continued drive to unseat President Bush and promote himself at his country's expense (as well as at the expense of those who fight to defend it), Al Gore has identified "a network of 'rapid response' digital Brown Shirts who work to pressure reporters and their editors for 'undermining support for our troops.'" That's one group I want to join, pardner!

Therefore, I proudly proclaim my membership in The Alliance of Digital Brownshirts.

The Alliance of Digital Brownshirts

Thanks to Jessica's Well for the idea and the image, and to the Commissar for pointing the way.

Final Update: Rather than try to keep this post updated, and to give a more permanent prominence to The Alliance, I've created a new blogroll in the left sidebar.



Thursday, June 24, 2004
 
Support the mission

Bill from INDC Journal (he of the moonbat studies) tells us about a letter from Marine Major Ben Connable in Iraq.
This is my third deployment with the 1st Marine Division to the Middle East. This is the third time I've heard the quavering cries of the talking heads predicting failure and calling for withdrawal. This is the third time I find myself shaking my head in disbelief. Setbacks and tragedy are part and parcel of war and must be accepted on the battlefield. We can and will achieve our goals in Iraq.
No weeping, wailing or gnashing of teeth among that crowd, not that I expected there would be. Folks who haven't spent time around military folks see this as false bravado, even foolishness. They're wrong. Maj. Connable is exhibiting determination. Resolve. Certainty. The major's closing points are instructive for those who will learn:
Nothing any talking head will say can deter me or my fellow Marines from caring about the people of Iraq, or take away from the sacrifices of our comrades. Fear in the face of adversity is human nature, and many people who take the counsel of their fears speak today. We are not deaf to their cries; neither do we take heed. All we ask is that Americans stand by us by supporting not just the troops, but also the mission. We'll take care of the rest.
Semper fi, Major. Fair winds and following seas.

 
Realities of Islam

Islamic scholars discuss the appropriateness of beheading under Islamic law in an article in today's Washington Times.
The killings of Americans Nicholas Berg and Paul M. Johnson Jr. and South Korean Kim Sun-il -- and that of Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl in 2002 in Pakistan -- are "an extreme form of execution that is most inhumane," said Sam Hamod, former director of the Islamic Center in the District who is now a lecturer and writer near San Diego. The executioners, who claim to act in the name of Islam, he said, "may find a hadith [or saying of Muhammad] that supports it, but the Koran doesn't allow it." The killers didn't even do the job right, he said. "If they are going to have an execution, the [executioner] must say a prayer and ask for forgiveness from God for what he is doing and pray for the person's soul being killed," he said. "You can't do it like the idiots on TV. The right thing to do is slit the person's throat, not cut off the entire head."
It sounds like these Islamic murderers need a little education on their religion, and how to properly perform their barbarous acts. The article also quotes Rabbi Brad Hirschfield of the National Jewish Center for Learning and Leadership as saying,
"Right now in the world, many Muslims are devoting their lives to the truth of decapitation," he said. "Simply to say, 'It's not Islam' is not a helpful response, because for those who are doing it, it is."
So true, Rabbi, so true.


Wednesday, June 23, 2004
 
I have to call 'em like I see 'em

James Joyner points us to an OpinionJournal article by Bret Stephens which analyzes the statements of several leading Democrats, such as Sidney Blumenthal, Al Gore and Paul Krugman.
According to Sidney Blumenthal, a onetime adviser to president Bill Clinton who now writes a column for Britain's Guardian newspaper, President Bush today runs "what is in effect a gulag," stretching "from prisons in Afghanistan to Iraq, from Guantanamo to secret CIA prisons around the world." Mr. Blumenthal says "there has been nothing like this system since the fall of the Soviet Union." In another column, Mr. Blumenthal compares the April death toll for American soldiers in Iraq to the Eastern Front in the Second World War. Mr. Bush's "splendid little war," he writes, "has entered a Stalingrad-like phase of urban siege and house-to-house combat." The factual bases for these claims are, first, that the U.S. holds some 10,000 "enemy combatants" prisoner; and second, that 122 U.S. soldiers were killed in action in April.
To cut to the chase, Bret compares those US figures to the actual figures from the historical events referenced by Blumenthal: In January 1940, the Soviet Union held over three million people in "corrective work camps," awaiting trial or transfer to a work camp, or in the custody of the NKVD; and as for the Stalingrad reference,
German deaths between Jan. 10 and Feb. 2, 1943, numbered 100,000, according to British historian John Keegan. And those were just the final agonizing days of a battle that had raged since the previous August.
Bret states that there are only two possible explanations for the radical, over-the-top, ignore-the-facts statements from these men and other Democrats like them: either President Bush is as bad as these critics say he is, or Sid, Al and Paul and their ilk are insane. He presents a calm, reasonable analysis and conclusion. Please go read the whole thing. I'll wait here for you. No, go on, go read Bret's article. Okay, ya done? Good. Because I'm not going to present "a calm, reasonable analysis and conclusion." I'm going to present cold fury. These anti-Bush extremists are dangerous. Through their lies (N.B.: my definition of a lie includes any time someone tries to get others to believe something that is known to be untrue, even through simple hyperbole), they are seeking to hurt President Bush politically. The downside to this is that our nation takes a hit as "collateral damage" every time they do that. They spout lies, knowing they are lies, and reduce our nation's prestige in the eyes of the world, hurt our ability to negotiate with other nations, heighten the danger for our servicemembers in their fight against terrorism, and encourage our enemies around the world. Until now, I have followed a similar path to many others by avoiding the "T-word." Just because someone disagrees with you politically is no reason to question their patriotism, and certainly no justification for calling them traitors. But that doesn't describe what we're talking about here. We're talking about people knowingly taking active steps that harm our country, for their own perceived political benefit. If you folks feel uncomfortable labeling these liars for their actions, don't worry about it. I'll do it for you. They're traitors. They are causing the deaths of our own servicemembers, American and other countries' civilians in the Middle East, as well as Arabs and Muslims in the region. They're traitors. Plain and simple. It's a shame political realities will prevent them from ever being indicted, tried, convicted and sentenced appropriately for their traitorous actions. The US and the rest of the world would be better off without them. Ptui.

 
Flight Attendants still taught to cooperate with hijackers

Despite the events of September 11, 2001, the airlines are still training their flight attendants to cooperate with hijackers. According to Patricia Friend, president of the Association of Flight Attendants:
Attendants are trained to fight fires in the air, administer first aid and evacuate a plane in case of an accident, but instruction on dealing with hijackings advises flight attendants to remain complacent.
Since the airlines, as a group, are so slow on the uptake on everything else, I can't say I'm too surprised that they haven't changed their training approach. I wouldn't be surprised if the leadership at the various airlines still believe that obedience and cooperation are the best response to a hijacking. They're wrong, of course. I'm not much of a union man, and I've heard from a few members of AFA that they do a lousy job of representing their membership in the realm of compensation negotiations, but their complaint rings true on this issue.


Tuesday, June 22, 2004
 
Neighbor is going to jail

Last week, my hunting buddy's next door neighbor admitted he had embezzled over $700,000 from his employer over the past four years.
[Max] Lauw orchestrated a scheme in which he sold products produced for [his employer's] exclusive use to two other companies and diverted much of the proceeds to his personal bank accounts.
It appears that Max arranged to have the payments wired to an account in an Indonesian bank, and then two Indonesian accomplices would wire money from that account to Max's personal bank account here in Virginia. I suppose this activity is what paid for the BMW and the Porsche I frequently saw parked in his driveway whenever I visited my friend. Sentencing will be held in August, when Max faces up to 20 years in jail and a $500,000 fine. Of course, he's also responsible for restitution to his former employer. I really feel for his wife and daughters, truly the innocent victims in this affair.


Saturday, June 19, 2004
 
He's had enough

Robert Prather, proprietor of Insults Unpunished, has decided to take a break from blogging — which may well become permanent. I've always felt that almost any endeavor should only be pursued as long as one finds it enjoyable. If blogging has turned into a chore for Robert, then this is certainly the best course of action. I've found his blog quite enjoyable, and has always been one of the top blogs in my RSS reader. I'll miss reading him. Take care, Robert. Here's hoping you'll return refreshed and rejuvenated in a few weeks, but if not, it's been fun while it lasted.


Tuesday, June 15, 2004
 
The Uncertainty Principle

Phil Massey has an interesting idea on how to reduce Coalition casualties in Iraq. Specifically, those from RPGs (Rocket Propelled Grenades), which are a major cause of death and damage by the insurgents. Rather than spell it out, I'll merely point to Phil's post from yesterday, as well as his original post. Via Dean Esmay. I'm no Instapundit or Matt Rustler, but I'll link directly to the source, which is the best way to go, anyway. Oh, and for the record, Matt updated his post to link directly to Flying Space Monkeys.


Sunday, June 13, 2004
 
New computer

As a software developer for a consulting company, my employer provides me with a computer, in case I need to work from home. Over the past couple of years, they've gone to supplying us with notebook computers instead of desktops. My time has come for a replacement, so I picked up my new notebook on Friday. I'm mostly over the pain of getting it set up the way I want it, so I thought I'd share the specs (no, I'm not gloating, honest). Dell Latitude D800 Pentium M 1.7GHz 1 GB 266MHz DDR SDRAM 60 GB hard drive (looks more like 55 GB, but who's counting?) DVD ROM (woulda been nice to get at least a CD-RW, but oh well...) 15.4" WUXGA Display (about an inch wider than my old notebook) 802.11b/g internal wireless card NVIDIA GeForce FX Go5200, 64 MB memory 10/100/1000 Mb internal network card Internal V.90 modem I think that covers it. I'm pretty happy with it, although the odd 1920x1200 resolution seems to make some graphics look funky. Almost everything is sharp and vivid, but I'm finding some choppiness or aliasing on a significant number of graphics, icons, etc. I've tinkered with the video card's settings, ensuring anti-aliasing is on, most importantly. We'll have to see what I find out over time. Anyway, it's a nice computer. Woohoo!


Wednesday, June 09, 2004
 
Comments problem resolved

Comments (and trackbacks) were out of commission for a while, but they appear to be working now.

 
Announcing the USS John F Kerry - CVN-78

I just got this exciting news in an email from my friend, Dave:

Remember when you vote in November that President Kerry will be cutting defense dollars where he can because he believes in a lighter, more maneuverable force. The Navy is already getting prepared by redesignating the new Coral Sea class of light aircraft carriers after him. This is the prototype:


USS John F Kerry CVN-78

In case it's too small to read, photo credit goes to Erick McCarthy.



Tuesday, June 08, 2004
 
Why are these links here?

At the bottom of most pages of my blog are a couple of linked questions: What's a "Jew?" What's a "peckerwood?" A new friend of mind was bothered by them when he saw them, and told me he felt it distracted from the issue at hand. That's when I realized that I needed to provide some sort of context for those links. A number of folks several months back noticed that performing a search on Google for the term "Jew" resulted in a top-most result of an anti-Semitic web site. Since Google results are based on how many links point to which site, many of us posted blog entries intended to raise a more appropriate web page to the top of the list. The effort was successful for a few weeks, but the anti-Semitic site bubbled back up to the top ranking. The author of one of the blogs I read regularly suggested that, in addition to repeating our efforts to link "Jew" to a more appropriate site, we should also link the term peckerwood to the aforementioned anti-Jew site, and since I agreed with him 100%, I followed suit. Several weeks after that, another blogger suggested that we permanently place these links in our blog templates, to serve as a constant pressure to provide appropriate Google results. I agreed, so I added those links to my template, and now they show on every page. I'm sick to the gills with the crackpots who believe Jews are behind every bad thing that happens in the world. They postulate that Jews control our government, they control the world's markets, they orchestrated the September 11 attacks, and every other screwball theory that can be painfully (though not believably) twisted into a way to blame Jews. These little links are my small effort to fight back. There's no room in the world for this kind of hate. So, that's the context for those links. I hope you'll understand.

 
Bill interviews Michael Berg

I've been remiss by not mentioning the interview Bill (from INDCJournal) managed to get with Michael Berg, father of the contractor who was assassinated in Iraq last month, Nick Berg. Bill tracked Mr Berg down at an International ANSWER rally, and managed to squeeze in with the "traditional media." It's a great read, and does Bill proud. He's really good at this kinda stuff. Who says the blogosphere doesn't do original reporting?

 
Honoring the crew of the USS Liberty

June 8th, 1967: The USS Liberty was plying the waters of the Eastern Mediterranean Sea, monitoring signals from Israel and Egypt, then fighting the Six Day War. Suddenly, they were under attack — by Israeli jets, shortly followed by Israeli torpedo boats. In the end, the attack left 34 crewmen dead and another 170 or so wounded.
Damaged hull of the USS Liberty - Photo credit USSLiberty.org
Many of those killed and injured were Communications Technicians (now called Cryptologic Technicians), performing the intelligence collection efforts aboard the Liberty. Had I been old enough, and joined the Navy ten years earlier, I could well have been among their number. Their legacy has continued through the years in the Naval Security Group, especially among those of us whose primary focus was the Middle East. As you might expect, Israel has maintained throughout the intervening years that it was all a tragic mistake, and paid the US Government and the victims and their families a total of $13 million in reparations. Many are convinced, though, that the attack was deliberate: the Israelis knew the Liberty was American and not Egyptian, contrary to their claims; that the Liberty was clearly flying the US flag; and despite being told by pilots and gunboats that the target was American, their controllers insisted they press the attack. Many people who are much more knowledgeable than I am have written extensively on this subject. David C. Walsh has recently written an article for The San Diego Tribune, reprinted by the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs: Attack on the Liberty: Lifting the "Fog of War". WRMEA appears to be very pro-Palestinian and anti-Israel, but Mr Walsh's article is reasonably written. Dr. John Borne wrote an historical study of the incident for his PhD dissertation at New York University, and has many articles on the Liberty attack on his web site. This is how he introduces them:
On June 8, 1967, during the Six Day War, Israeli forces attacked the USS Liberty, a U.S. Navy intelligence-gathering ship off the coast of Gaza, killing 35 men and wounding 171. Israel apologized and called the attack an accident. The U.S. government accepted the apology and did not openly challenge the explanation For almost three decades the crewmen of the Liberty have waged a campaign to have the attack investigated. Indeed, they claim that not only was the attack was intentional, but also that Johnson recalled the Sixth Fleet rescue flights to avoid a clash between the U.S. and Israel.
I can't post on the Liberty without mentioning the USS Liberty Memorial web site, created by Jim Ennes and Joe Meadors, survivors of the attack. There they have exhaustive resources on the history and evidence of the attack, as well as a sister site, USS Liberty Court of Inquiry. These guys were there, Israelis were trying to kill them, so they hold a strong conviction that the attack was deliberate, and have a lot of evidence to support their conclusion. It's worth a visit. Or two.
Rescue efforts the next day - Photo credit USSLiberty.org
Regardless of the truths in this tragic event, whether it was deliberate as claimed by Jim, Joe and many others, or it was the tragic accident described by the Israeli government, I wanted to take the opportunity to honor my fallen shipmates from the USS Liberty, as well as all of those who had to suffer through this attack. Sometimes we forget that even "skimmer sailors," even spooks like us, can sometimes be at the pointy end of the spear. Update: Submitted to the Beltway Traffic Jam.


Sunday, June 06, 2004
 
Reaction to President Reagan's death

Buckingham Palace:
The Queen is saddened by the news.
Former Prime Minister Baroness Thatcher:
President Reagan was one of my closest political and dearest personal friends. He will be missed not only by those who new him and not only by the nation that he served so proudly and loved so deeply, but also by millions of men and women who live in freedom today because of the policies he pursued. Ronald Reagan had a higher claim than any other leader to have won the Cold War for liberty and he did it without a shot being fired. To have achieved so much against so odds and with such humour and humanity made Ronald Reagan a truly great American hero.
We here in America can easily lose sight of the global impact of Reagan's presidency. There are people around the world, especially in Eastern Europe, who are free today due in part to Ronald Reagan's efforts as President of the United States. It's fitting that we should indulge our sorrow on this sad occasion. One of Ronald Reagan's last public statements:
"When the Lord calls me home . . . I will leave with the greatest love for this country of ours and eternal optimism for its future. I now begin the journey that will lead me into the sunset of my life. I know that for America there will always be a bright dawn ahead. Thank you, my friends. May God always bless you."
What greater eloquence has ever been uttered? Update: James has a fitting tribute.


Saturday, June 05, 2004
 
A moment of respect

No one reading my blog is going to be learning for the first time that Ronald Reagan passed away earlier today. But I must pay my respects to an able President whose mark on our country will last for a long time. My take on President Reagan is that he was a deeply principled man, who stuck to those principles in a job much more given to swaying with the prevailing winds. His efforts during his terms as President have greatly benefited our country. It was an honor to have him as my Commander in Chief for almost half of my naval career, and for longer than any other Commander in Chief during my career. I salute you, sir. Fair winds and following seas. You stand relieved.


Friday, June 04, 2004
 
ACLU using the First Amendment as a bludgeon

I am a ardent supporter of the First Amendment to our Constitution. You remember, the one that that says that Congress shall not inhibit our free speech, or the freedom of the press. Or our right to assemble peaceably, or to petition the government for redress of grievances. Oh yeah, there's one other clause, too. Congress can't pass a law establishing a religion, or prohibiting the free exercise of any religion. You know, in general, where I'm going with this. Jennifer tells us that the County of Los Angeles has a little cross on their official seal, which took me a bit to locate, tucked away among various other symbols sprinkled around the seal. As I understand it, this cross is in recognition of the history of Los Angeles County ("The Angels," in English), since it was initially populated through the efforts of the Roman Catholic Church. No matter. The American Civil Liberties Union has decided that the little cross violates the First Amendment. Someone explain to me how this is connected to Congress making a law establishing a religion. Someone please explain to me whose civil liberties are being pummelled into crumbs by the presence of this cross on the official Seal of the County of Los Angeles. These people disgust me. Please be sure to read all of Jennifer's thing. Update: I neglected to mention an important point (which you will have already found for yourself if you read all of Jennifer's post). From a press release by Supervisor Michael D. Antonovich:
Also, figured prominently on the County seal is Pomona, the mythical Roman goddess of fruit. "Regarding a pagan goddess on the County’s seal, the ACLU’s silence is deafening," said Antonovich.
The ACLU certainly gives the appearance of only protesting against mainstream religions. I suppose it's just another form of Affirmative Action; they must believe we need more religious diversity in America.

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Site search

Powered by:

 
 
 
This page is powered by Blogger, the easy way to update your web site.
 
   
   
 
Blogarama - The Blog Directory
 
   
 
 
 
 
In loving memory
Dr Edward N Garrett
1925 - 2004
 

Home  |  Archives
 
  
© 2002-2008 Boyd D Garrett Sr